PDA

View Full Version : Foreclosure Nightmares: 3 Families Fight for Their Homes



kong
01-19-2012, 12:37 PM
Foreclosure Nightmares: 3 Families Fight for Their Homes
With more than 200,000 households receiving foreclosure notices each month, there are bound to be a few mistakes. But for some unlucky homeowners, these blunders carry some serious consequences. Maria and Joseph Perez were threatened with foreclosure and abandoned their home after a routine refinancing of their mortgage turned into a four-year (and counting) battle. The couple had initially purchased their Seguin, Texas home in 2007 with a mortgage that was backed by Bank of America and serviced by a firm called Taylor, Bean & Whitaker. In August 2009, the couple refinanced the loan through Quicken in order to get a better rate. So Jose was puzzled when, a month after refinancing, he received a notice from Bank of America that said he was behind on his payments on the old loan.
It turned out that Taylor, Bean & Whitaker, the mortgage servicer, had ceased operations the same month they had refinanced. And Bank of America hadn't received the funds from the new loan to pay off the old one, said attorney Barry Brown, who is representing the couple. Since there is pending litigation, Bank of America wouldn't comment on this specific case. But company spokesman Richard Simon said that when Taylor, Bean & Whitaker went bankrupt, the state government froze its deposits, including monthly payments that customers had made to the servicer and recently processed payoffs on refinanced loans.
Adding an even odder twist was that Quicken had sold the servicing rights to the new loan to Bank of America. So while the couple was sending Bank of America payments on the new loan each month, Bank of America was sending them notices demanding payments for the old loan.
After several weeks of talks with the Perezes in late 2009, Bank of America finally acknowledged that they had refinanced their loan and stopped sending the payment notices, said Brown. The couple thought the situation had been cleared up.
But about a year later, the bank started asking for payments again. Somehow, the Perez's loan was again flagged as past due even though the frozen payments on the old loan from Taylor, Bean & Whitaker had been released to Bank of America.
"The Perezes began to get collection calls and threats," said Brown. "They barraged them with foreclosure notices, 16 in one month." The couple, who have two young children, said they were being driven crazy. Their credit scores suffered. To cope, Jose, who is an electrical technician with Tyson Foods, asked the company to transfer him. They sold the house a year ago and moved to Kansas, far from family and friends.
The move ended the foreclosure fight, but the Perez's are suing Bank of America for unspecified damages for pain and suffering. They're charging violations of Real Estate Settlement Provisions Act (RESPA) law, which specifies how lenders should offer mortgages and under what terms, and debt collection abuse laws.
"They feel like they're in exile," said Brown.
You don't own your home anymore -- we do
Brian and Khanklink Pyron lived happily in their Houston-area home for two years before they realized that they weren't technically the rightful owners -- and the bank that was wanted its property back.
Right after the couple bought their home in 2008, the title company, Esquire, went bankrupt. The problem was that Esquire never transferred the money the Pyrons paid for the home to the seller's mortgage holder, Wells Fargo Bank, nor did it transfer the title of the home. The money that was supposed to go to Wells Fargo instead wound up with the state of Texas guarantor, which was handling all of Esquire's accounts. Meanwhile, Wells Fargo, which hadn't received a dime from the sale yet, put a lien on the home.
"The title company meant to transfer the funds and the title but it went defunct, so we had no recourse in terms of recouping the loan," said Vickee Adams, a Wells Fargo spokeswoman. The Pyrons found out that the title transfer never took place after they mailed their property tax check and got a letter back from the county clerk's office telling them that the taxes had already been paid by Wells Fargo. When they called the bank to find out why they had paid the taxes, they found out that the bank still owned the home.
"We're going crazy," said Brian Pyron. "We had no idea this was happening. We were never late with payments." The other shoe dropped when Wells Fargo filed a foreclosure notice. After some wrangling, the bank told the Pyrons they would resell the house to them. But there was a catch: The bank, which had approved the original deal as a short sale for $130,000, now wanted $172,000, said Pyron.
The couple hired a lawyer but couldn't afford the fees so they let him go. Their credit scores plunged and they lived in constant fear of losing their home.
Then, last Friday, came a fortunate turn in the case. Wells Fargo met with the Pyrons and told them they would release the lien on the home. The bank didn't ask for any concessions or extra cash. Now the Pyrons, who have been making their mortgage payments throughout this whole ordeal, are just waiting for the paperwork. "This is a huge relief for us," said Brian. "I'm glad to know that [we] were able resolve the matter," said Wells Fargo's Adams. "These actions reflect the consistent effort we pursue to help our customers retain home ownership."
You paid too early
Sharon Bullington, 70, and her husband James, a 78-year-old retired General Motors employee, would never have guessed that paying their mortgage bill too early would cause them to almost lose their home.
Initially, medical bills pushed them to default on their mortgage. At the time, the couple owed nearly $180,000 on their New Port Richey, Fla. home, and their monthly mortgage payments were more than they could afford.
But the couple qualified for a trial modification of their mortgage through the government's Home Affordable Modification Program, which offered them a loan with much more manageable monthly payments. Yet, just a couple months later, Sharon found out that they had been booted from the HAMP program. A letter from her lender, Bank of America, stated that the Bullington's were no longer eligible for the HAMP program because they were not able to "to make each payment in the month in which it is due."
Sharon had made the "mistake" of sending the payment for January in December. The couple was being kicked out of the program for paying too early. And since the trial modification fell through, the couple was yet again facing foreclosure.
After making many calls and enlisting a lawyer, the couple got a break. The case, which began with the January, 2011 early payment, was finally resolved in August with the bank admitting its error and refinancing the mortgage for the couple, said Shawn Yesner, the Bullington's attorney.
.

kong
01-19-2012, 12:39 PM
Bank of America is #1 in this whole foreclosure mess, and this year they are being investigated and I hope they have to pay thru the nose

kong
01-19-2012, 12:44 PM
Foreclosure free ride: 3 years, no payments
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Delinquent borrowers facing foreclosure are learning that they can stay in their homes for years, as long as they're willing to put up a fight.
Among the tactics: Challenging the bank's actions, waiting to file paperwork right up until the deadline, requesting the lender dig up original paperwork or, in some extreme cases, declaring bankruptcy.
Nationwide, the average time it takes to process a foreclosure -- from the first missed payment to the final foreclosure auction -- has climbed to 674 days from 253 days just four years ago, according to LPS Applied Analytics.
It takes much longer than that in Florida, where the process averages 1,027 days, nearly 3 years. In D.C., foreclosure averages 1,053 days and delinquent borrowers in New York often stay in their homes for an average of 906 days.
And while some borrowers are looking for ways to make good with lenders and get their homes back, many aren't paying a dime. Nearly 40% of homeowners in default have not made a payment in at least two years, according to LPS.
Many of these homeowners are staying in their homes based on a technicality. There is rarely any dispute over whether or not they have stopped paying their mortgage, said David Dunn, a partner at law firm Hogan Lovells in New York, who represents banks and other financial institutions in foreclosure cases.
"In my experience, they never say, 'I'm not delinquent' or 'I want to pay my bill but I'm confused over who to send it to,' or 'Oh my God, you mean I didn't pay my mortgage?' They're not in technical default. They're in default because they're not paying," he said.
Ironically enough, the banks have given delinquent borrowers some of the ammunition they need to delay the foreclosure process. During the "robo-signing" scandal in 2010, it was revealed that bank employees signed paperwork attesting to facts they had no personal knowledge of. Now, borrowers are routinely challenging that paperwork.
A Staten Island, N.Y. man who owed $300,000 on his mortgage and hadn't made a payment in two years, said his attorney used the robo-signing issue to fight his foreclosure. In his case, the lender's paperwork included many different papers signed by the same employee. The problem was that the signatures didn't match. The judge dismissed the lender's case against the borrower, although it can be re-filed.
"It looks like I'll be in my home for some time to come," said the homeowner, who asked to remain anonymous. He said he is currently not making any payments on his home.
Sometimes just asking the bank to produce the paperwork that shows it is the legal holder of the mortgage note can stall a repossession, said attorney Robert Brown. Since mortgages are often transferred electronically, the official paperwork often gets misplaced.
"My lawyer asked my bank to produce an affidavit that entitled them to foreclose," said a client of Brown's, who lives in Harlem and also asked to remain anonymous. "They couldn't do it." The case was dismissed, without prejudice, though the lender can try again -- if it finds the paperwork. In some of the more extreme cases, borrowers will file for bankruptcy in order to block a foreclosure. In these instances, courts order creditors to cease their collection activities immediately. Home auctions can be postponed as the bankruptcy plays out, which can take months. The ensuing delays are further harming the housing market. People who stay in homes undergoing foreclosure for years often don't maintain the properties, causing blight and lowering property values in the surrounding neighborhoods, said Dunn. Then there are the court costs that lenders bear, which will eventually be borne by home buyers as lenders increase their borrowing fees to cover the increased risk, Dunn said. David Berenbaum of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC), a community activism group, disputes the contention that owners are gaming the system for free rent and hurting the housing market. "Most people do everything in their power to maintain these homes," he said. "They take in relatives, get second jobs and even rent out rooms." What really needs to be done, he said, is for lenders to work harder to find solutions that allow delinquent borrowers who can afford to make reasonable mortgage payments to keep their homes.

kong
01-19-2012, 01:00 PM
I know for a fact that certain Banksters will not take any payments while a house is in the foreclosure process