Wrestling Desires - Home of Sports Entertainment Community

User Tag List

  • Amused
  • Angry
  • Annoyed
  • Awesome
  • Bemused
  • Cocky
  • Cool
  • Crazy
  • Crying
  • Depressed
  • Down
  • Drunk
  • Embarrased
  • Enraged
  • Friendly
  • Geeky
  • Godly
  • Happy
  • Hateful
  • Hungry
  • Innocent
  • Meh
  • Piratey
  • Poorly
  • Sad
  • Secret
  • Shy
  • Sneaky
  • Tired
  • Wtf
  • View Poll Results: Is The WWE Network Good Or Bad For the WWE?

    Voters
    7. You may not vote on this poll
    • Good

      6 85.71%
    • Bad

      1 14.29%
    Results 1 to 7 of 7

    Thread: Is The WWE Network Good Or Bad For the WWE?

    1. #1
      Administrator
      Yes! Yes! Yes!
       
      I am:
      Friendly
       
      Oldschool's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2008
      Posts
      46,155
      Post Thanks / Like
      WD Coins
      21,166,263,511,884 (110,274 Banked)
      Mentioned
      22 Post(s)
      Tagged
      0 Thread(s)
      Quoted
      36 Post(s)
      vCash
      990
      vBActivity - Stats
      Points
      17,712
      Level
      37
      vBActivity - Bars
      Lv. Percent
      87.03%
      Achievements Posts

      Default Is The WWE Network Good Or Bad For the WWE?

      What do you think? And why? Has it increased your enjoyment of the WWE? Do you watch more or less than before its launch?





      Please order your ul.to account from here to help cover costs - thanks for your support, you guys rock !!!!!
      Code:
      http://ul.to/ref/3078460

    2. #2
      The Clown Prince of WD
      This user has no status.
       
      I am:
      ----
       
      Joker's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jul 2008
      Location
      Town Creek, AL
      Age
      37
      Posts
      935
      Post Thanks / Like
      WD Coins
      124 (0 Banked)
      Mentioned
      3 Post(s)
      Tagged
      0 Thread(s)
      Quoted
      6 Post(s)
      vCash
      500
      vBActivity - Stats
      Points
      494
      Level
      8
      vBActivity - Bars
      Lv. Percent
      0.95%
      Achievements Posts

      Default

      I have to say it's good because it gives people an option to view WWE's pay-per-view events and more for $10/month (I'm rounding) as opposed to paying your cable or satellite provider $60-$70 for a single event.
      I would rather die peacefully in my sleep like my grandfather than screaming in terror like his passengers.




      You don't have to be crazy to join Wrestling Desires. We'll train you for that.

      If you think I'm crazy now, just wait till the sedatives wear off.



    3. #3
      Junior Member
      This user has no status.
       
      I am:
      ----
       

      Join Date
      Aug 2014
      Posts
      6
      Post Thanks / Like
      WD Coins
      6 (0 Banked)
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)
      Tagged
      0 Thread(s)
      Quoted
      1 Post(s)
      vCash
      500
      vBActivity - Stats
      Points
      301
      Level
      6
      vBActivity - Bars
      Lv. Percent
      36.92%

      Default

      Overall its good for the cost of what you get, me personally I would only use it for old events as nothing they have done in the last 5-6 years have interested me.

    4. #4
      WD HOFers
      This user has no status.
       
      I am:
      ----
       

      Join Date
      May 2014
      Posts
      42
      Post Thanks / Like
      WD Coins
      225 (0 Banked)
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)
      Tagged
      0 Thread(s)
      Quoted
      4 Post(s)
      vCash
      500
      vBActivity - Stats
      Points
      402
      Level
      7
      vBActivity - Bars
      Lv. Percent
      27.38%

      Default

      Is both good and bad. For those wanting cheap access to PPV's and old content, it would be good. Unfortunately it also gives WWE the option to be a bit lazy because no matter what, the money is coming in. There is less need to put on quality PPV. I guess it depends on what people are after.

    5. #5
      Administrator
      Yes! Yes! Yes!
       
      I am:
      Friendly
       
      Oldschool's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2008
      Posts
      46,155
      Post Thanks / Like
      WD Coins
      21,166,263,511,884 (110,274 Banked)
      Mentioned
      22 Post(s)
      Tagged
      0 Thread(s)
      Quoted
      36 Post(s)
      vCash
      990
      vBActivity - Stats
      Points
      17,712
      Level
      37
      vBActivity - Bars
      Lv. Percent
      87.03%
      Achievements Posts

      Default

      Quote Originally Posted by TheAsylum View Post
      Is both good and bad. For those wanting cheap access to PPV's and old content, it would be good. Unfortunately it also gives WWE the option to be a bit lazy because no matter what, the money is coming in. There is less need to put on quality PPV. I guess it depends on what people are after.
      This is actually what I was referring to, its effect on the WWE, not whether or not the service is enjoyable. Obviously we are happy to get all those classic shows, but what is it doing to today's WWE PPV's and other new shows? Are they just as good as they were in say 2013? I really like the Network, but I must say in some ways it has hurt the WWE. And to top it off, even with unlimited airtime some events simply aren't promoted ery much, or even shown as they should be [Starrcade?]





      Please order your ul.to account from here to help cover costs - thanks for your support, you guys rock !!!!!
      Code:
      http://ul.to/ref/3078460

    6. #6
      Junior Member
      This user has no status.
       
      I am:
      ----
       
      M.V.W.'s Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2017
      Posts
      16
      Post Thanks / Like
      WD Coins
      35 (0 Banked)
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)
      Tagged
      0 Thread(s)
      Quoted
      7 Post(s)
      vCash
      500
      vBActivity - Stats
      Points
      327
      Level
      6
      vBActivity - Bars
      Lv. Percent
      61.29%

      Default

      Doubt the Network has much bearing on WWE's effort. PPVs tie into TV while Raw and SmackDown aren't available on the Network until a month later. Also, the Network only content tends to get good reviews.

      New column on my site dedicated to WWE
      My Love/Hate Relationship With The Brock Party
      http://www.justbringingtheraw.com/columns/my-love-hate-relationship-with-the-brock-party.html

    7. #7
      Administrator
      Yes! Yes! Yes!
       
      I am:
      Friendly
       
      Oldschool's Avatar
      Join Date
      May 2008
      Posts
      46,155
      Post Thanks / Like
      WD Coins
      21,166,263,511,884 (110,274 Banked)
      Mentioned
      22 Post(s)
      Tagged
      0 Thread(s)
      Quoted
      36 Post(s)
      vCash
      990
      vBActivity - Stats
      Points
      17,712
      Level
      37
      vBActivity - Bars
      Lv. Percent
      87.03%
      Achievements Posts

      Default

      Quote Originally Posted by M.V.W. View Post
      Doubt the Network has much bearing on WWE's effort. PPVs tie into TV while Raw and SmackDown aren't available on the Network until a month later. Also, the Network only content tends to get good reviews.
      That's one of the major issues, PPV's simply aren't that important to fans or the WWE any more ... The Hidden Gems and Network shows add a lot to the WWE, and I hope those stay, but we need all PPV's to be given a spotlight and proper buildup





      Please order your ul.to account from here to help cover costs - thanks for your support, you guys rock !!!!!
      Code:
      http://ul.to/ref/3078460

    Thread Information

    Users Browsing this Thread

    There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  

    Important Site Information